<html>
<head><meta charset="utf-8"><title>Inline asm WG · t-lang · Zulip Chat Archive</title></head>
<h2>Stream: <a href="https://rust-lang.github.io/zulip_archive/stream/213817-t-lang/index.html">t-lang</a></h2>
<h3>Topic: <a href="https://rust-lang.github.io/zulip_archive/stream/213817-t-lang/topic/Inline.20asm.20WG.html">Inline asm WG</a></h3>

<hr>

<base href="https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com">

<head><link href="https://rust-lang.github.io/zulip_archive/style.css" rel="stylesheet"></head>

<a name="182864012"></a>
<h4><a href="https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com#narrow/stream/213817-t-lang/topic/Inline%20asm%20WG/near/182864012" class="zl"><img src="https://rust-lang.github.io/zulip_archive/assets/img/zulip.svg" alt="view this post on Zulip" style="width:20px;height:20px;"></a> Amanieu <a href="https://rust-lang.github.io/zulip_archive/stream/213817-t-lang/topic/Inline.20asm.20WG.html#182864012">(Dec 07 2019 at 21:58)</a>:</h4>
<p>I'm currently looking into writing the RFC for the inline asm project group. I'm trying to base it on the FFI unwind group's RFC (<a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/2797" target="_blank" title="https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/2797">https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/2797</a>) but 90% of that RFC is just describing what a project group is.<br>
I don't think there is much point in repeating this for the asm project group, but then all that's left is just the charter and the motivation.</p>



<a name="182864016"></a>
<h4><a href="https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com#narrow/stream/213817-t-lang/topic/Inline%20asm%20WG/near/182864016" class="zl"><img src="https://rust-lang.github.io/zulip_archive/assets/img/zulip.svg" alt="view this post on Zulip" style="width:20px;height:20px;"></a> Amanieu <a href="https://rust-lang.github.io/zulip_archive/stream/213817-t-lang/topic/Inline.20asm.20WG.html#182864016">(Dec 07 2019 at 21:58)</a>:</h4>
<p>Do we still want to write an RFC for this or can we skip to just writing the charter?</p>



<a name="182865768"></a>
<h4><a href="https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com#narrow/stream/213817-t-lang/topic/Inline%20asm%20WG/near/182865768" class="zl"><img src="https://rust-lang.github.io/zulip_archive/assets/img/zulip.svg" alt="view this post on Zulip" style="width:20px;height:20px;"></a> Amanieu <a href="https://rust-lang.github.io/zulip_archive/stream/213817-t-lang/topic/Inline.20asm.20WG.html#182865768">(Dec 07 2019 at 22:52)</a>:</h4>
<p>Also, could someone with the appropriate permissions create a Zulip stream and a github repo for the WG?</p>



<a name="182885207"></a>
<h4><a href="https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com#narrow/stream/213817-t-lang/topic/Inline%20asm%20WG/near/182885207" class="zl"><img src="https://rust-lang.github.io/zulip_archive/assets/img/zulip.svg" alt="view this post on Zulip" style="width:20px;height:20px;"></a> XAMPPRocky <a href="https://rust-lang.github.io/zulip_archive/stream/213817-t-lang/topic/Inline.20asm.20WG.html#182885207">(Dec 08 2019 at 09:30)</a>:</h4>
<p><span class="user-mention" data-user-id="143274">@Amanieu</span> I believe you can leave out of the definition of project groups. We're working on a <a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/wg-governance/blob/master/draft-rfcs/working-group-terminology.md" target="_blank" title="https://github.com/rust-lang/wg-governance/blob/master/draft-rfcs/working-group-terminology.md">separate RFC</a> that defines that terminology. I think the intent of what a project group RFC is meant contain is the details of group e.g. "liasons, sheperds, members" , the charter itself, and the motivation/drawbacks/prior art/questions sections.</p>



<a name="182997295"></a>
<h4><a href="https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com#narrow/stream/213817-t-lang/topic/Inline%20asm%20WG/near/182997295" class="zl"><img src="https://rust-lang.github.io/zulip_archive/assets/img/zulip.svg" alt="view this post on Zulip" style="width:20px;height:20px;"></a> nikomatsakis <a href="https://rust-lang.github.io/zulip_archive/stream/213817-t-lang/topic/Inline.20asm.20WG.html#182997295">(Dec 09 2019 at 20:39)</a>:</h4>
<p><span class="user-mention" data-user-id="143274">@Amanieu</span> I think the idea would be to basically present the charter</p>



<a name="182997373"></a>
<h4><a href="https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com#narrow/stream/213817-t-lang/topic/Inline%20asm%20WG/near/182997373" class="zl"><img src="https://rust-lang.github.io/zulip_archive/assets/img/zulip.svg" alt="view this post on Zulip" style="width:20px;height:20px;"></a> nikomatsakis <a href="https://rust-lang.github.io/zulip_archive/stream/213817-t-lang/topic/Inline.20asm.20WG.html#182997373">(Dec 09 2019 at 20:40)</a>:</h4>
<p>I'll make the stream / repo, I'll also create one for the safe-transmute (cc <span class="user-mention" data-user-id="224872">@Ryan Levick</span>, <span class="user-mention" data-user-id="239881">@Josh Triplett</span>)</p>



<a name="182997441"></a>
<h4><a href="https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com#narrow/stream/213817-t-lang/topic/Inline%20asm%20WG/near/182997441" class="zl"><img src="https://rust-lang.github.io/zulip_archive/assets/img/zulip.svg" alt="view this post on Zulip" style="width:20px;height:20px;"></a> nikomatsakis <a href="https://rust-lang.github.io/zulip_archive/stream/213817-t-lang/topic/Inline.20asm.20WG.html#182997441">(Dec 09 2019 at 20:40)</a>:</h4>
<p><span class="user-mention" data-user-id="219696">@XAMPPRocky</span> I wonder if it's time to move fwd with that RFC. I am getting more and more annoying at the lack of our terminology to distinguish (e.g.) compiler working groups and domain work groups as well.</p>



<hr><p>Last updated: Aug 07 2021 at 22:04 UTC</p>
</html>